The Foreclosure Myth: Why Millions of Americans Aren’t Really Losing Their Homes to Medical Bills

  • by: |
  • 06/30/2009
It is presently in vogue to blame most any problem or set back on health care costs. And why not? After all, telling Americans that they are one illness from being bankrupted and landing on the street is an effective strategy for getting them to support your solution. A couple weeks ago, I explained in depth why you should not trust statistics that claim that more than 62 percent of bankruptcies in the US are medically linked. But there is another statistic that is popping up here and there, that 1.5 million Americans will lose homes this year due to medical costs.
 
This number comes from an article by Christopher Tarver Robertson, Richard Egelhof and Michael Hoke published last year. You shouldn’t be surprised that the authors thank Elizabeth Warren, one of the authors of the flawed studies on bankruptcy and medical bills, because they have made precisely the same mistakes.
 
First, the authors report that 49 percent of the people surveyed, all of whom were on the brink of foreclosure, said that the situation “was caused in part by a medical problem” (emphasis original). Of this group, 32 percent cited illness or injuries, 23 percent pointed to high health care costs, 27 percent indicated time off from work, and 14 percent mentioned time spent taking care of someone else in their family.
 
The authors then add those who meet a host of other criteria to reach a total reported figure of around 7 in 10 foreclosures being caused in part by health care costs. Again a low threshold of medical bills ($2,000) and being out of work for two weeks in the last two years are among the criteria used to classify addition foreclosures as medically linked.
 
To begin with, it is unclear what exactly the first category, “illness or injury,” covers since both the costs and the lost wages that are the financial consequences of ill health are included separately. The $2,000 threshold is far too low to meaningfully measure whether medical bills were a serious contributor, especially in the absence of information about other debts and costs. Nor is this above the average out of pocket health expenses for a typical American family. And, as I have argued before, time spent out of work, whether for one’s own illness or to care for someone else, is not directly linked to the health care system but to larger social policy issues.
 
Second, the study also includes gambling, addiction, birth, and death in at least some of the calculations of which foreclosures are health care related. The health care expenses associated with the latter two belong with other medical costs. The expense of treating the former two could arguably be included as health care costs, although this is debatable, but the money squandered on such habits certainly should not be.
 
 Third, the study relies on self-reporting by the home-owners and had a very low response rate (about 7 percent) or 128 responses, creating significant potential for bias or over reporting. Attempts to control for this were inadequate and rather cursory. Finally, the article looks at only four states and then generalizes from them.
 
As in the case of bankruptcies, other studies have shown significantly different results and the authors admit that “most debtors cited one, two, or three other, completely distinct causes of foreclosure.” Given that the people surveyed are those already stretched by multiple debts and expenses, placing blame on medical costs is simply inaccurate in many, many cases.
 
 You can read the whole article here.
CMPI

Center for Medicine in the Public Interest is a nonprofit, non-partisan organization promoting innovative solutions that advance medical progress, reduce health disparities, extend life and make health care more affordable, preventive and patient-centered. CMPI also provides the public, policymakers and the media a reliable source of independent scientific analysis on issues ranging from personalized medicine, food and drug safety, health care reform and comparative effectiveness.

Blog Roll

Alliance for Patient Access Alternative Health Practice
AHRP
Better Health
BigGovHealth
Biotech Blog
BrandweekNRX
CA Medicine man
Cafe Pharma
Campaign for Modern Medicines
Carlat Psychiatry Blog
Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry: A Closer Look
Conservative's Forum
Club For Growth
CNEhealth.org
Diabetes Mine
Disruptive Women
Doctors For Patient Care
Dr. Gov
Drug Channels
DTC Perspectives
eDrugSearch
Envisioning 2.0
EyeOnFDA
FDA Law Blog
Fierce Pharma
fightingdiseases.org
Fresh Air Fund
Furious Seasons
Gooznews
Gel Health News
Hands Off My Health
Health Business Blog
Health Care BS
Health Care for All
Healthy Skepticism
Hooked: Ethics, Medicine, and Pharma
Hugh Hewitt
IgniteBlog
In the Pipeline
In Vivo
Instapundit
Internet Drug News
Jaz'd Healthcare
Jaz'd Pharmaceutical Industry
Jim Edwards' NRx
Kaus Files
KevinMD
Laffer Health Care Report
Little Green Footballs
Med Buzz
Media Research Center
Medrants
More than Medicine
National Review
Neuroethics & Law
Newsbusters
Nurses For Reform
Nurses For Reform Blog
Opinion Journal
Orange Book
PAL
Peter Rost
Pharm Aid
Pharma Blog Review
Pharma Blogsphere
Pharma Marketing Blog
Pharmablogger
Pharmacology Corner
Pharmagossip
Pharmamotion
Pharmalot
Pharmaceutical Business Review
Piper Report
Polipundit
Powerline
Prescription for a Cure
Public Plan Facts
Quackwatch
Real Clear Politics
Remedyhealthcare
Shark Report
Shearlings Got Plowed
StateHouseCall.org
Taking Back America
Terra Sigillata
The Cycle
The Catalyst
The Lonely Conservative
TortsProf
Town Hall
Washington Monthly
World of DTC Marketing
WSJ Health Blog