Latest Drugwonks' Blog
Some highlights:
The luncheon keynoter was Jeffrey Sachs, Quetelet Professor of Sustainable Development and Professor of Health Policy and Management at Columbia University -- but he's probably better known you drugwonks out there as the Director of the Earth Institute and author of "Common Wealth" and "The End of Poverty." Most of his talk was of the usual garden-variety "more government, please" variety -- but he did say one thing worth mentioning, that although he has some serious issues with pharmaceutical patents, "lifesaving innovation would be impossible without them." Yes -- "impossible." I wonder what Jamie Love will have to say about that?
The best panel of the day featured the health ministers from Kenya and Uganda (Peter Anyang' Nyong'o and Richard Nduhuura respectively), who spoke of their nations' need for enhanced healthcare infrastructure -- and then Alessandro Banchi (Chairman, Boehringer Ingelheim) laid it it out in black and white, "The elephant in the room is the fragility of healthcare systems -- not the price of drugs." Neither of the two ministers objected.
Zhang Weibo (Director, Pharmaceutical & Biological Review, People's Republic of China), spoke on the issue of IP and TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) -- an issue that deserves further discussion -- and will certainly get it. (Note to Congress: Better open the fortune cookie and start thinking about DSHEA reform.)
Swati Piramal (Director of Strategic Alliances, Piramal Healthcare, Ltd, India) spoke about India's emergence as a nation of pharmacetical innovation. She said her firm has a few drugs in the pipeline that can be brought to market for under $100,000,000. That got people's attention.
More from the IFPMA Assembly tomorrow.
Return Policy:
If you wish to return your donation, please contact us at (212) 417-9169. Please give us your order #, the amount you'd like us to return, and the reason. We will call you, generally within 5 business days, to arrange the necessary refunds.
Any donations made cannot be returned after 30 days.
In what he referred to as a “note on the desk” to the next Secretary of Health and Human Services, Mike Leavitt, the current inhabitant of that seat released “The Personalized Health Care Initiative.” Personalized health care should be an "explicit goal of health care reform,'' Leavitt said.
Oh well, better late than never. (The complete report can be found here.)
Hopefully there is a longer memo (perhaps with the keys to the backdoor and the security code to the secretarial washroom) on the urgent need to fund the Reagan/Udall Foundation.
But what I’d like to share with you is a comment that was posted in response to my discussion of NICE and its implications for US healthcare reform.
Here it is:
“Pitts cannot hope to cover all of the NHS's sins in a short piece. They also instruct doctors to lie to patients, informing them that life-saving treatments do not exist, when the NHS has merely decided the procedures are too pricey. It is better, in the view of the NHS, that people die rather than complain. Also, thousands die in their hospitals each year because staff cannot be bothered to wash their filthy hands. A trip to the NHS is often a death sentence, pure and simple."
And to that all I can add is, “Happy 60th Birthday, Prince Charles.”
Read CBS Article Here
July 17 (HealthDay News) -- Access to health care in the United States continues to elude more and more Americans, a new survey shows.
Read Full Forbes Article Here
Americans Want Overhaul of Health System
Read More
Leaders in health care and health care policy feel strongly that the way we pay for health care in the U.S. must be fundamentally reformed.
Tuesday, 4-Nov-2008
US trails other nations in chronic illness care
Read More
And it’s been ambiguity all the way down the line.
So here’s some welcome news: Tevi Troy, the HHS DepSec will host a series of conferences over the next two months to discuss how different HHS agencies can help improve the process. And is there anyone out there who feels improvement is not required?
The first conference takes place this Friday, November 14th at HHS HQ (aka the Hubert Humphrey Building) in Washington, DC. December forums are being scheduled for the west coast and Midwest.
At this first meeting, senior officials from NIH, FDA, CMS, and AHRQ will discuss (and likely have to defend) their agencies’ roles in facilitating the development of innovative medical technologies.
Topics include:
* The role of basic and clinical research conducted and supported by the NIH in the development of new products;
* FDA's efforts to use state-of-the-art science in support of medical product development, as well as to promote consistency and efficiency in medical product review;
* CMS’ perspective on the challenges innovators face in current reimbursement and coverage processes and how innovators can better navigate the system and;
* AHRQ’s role in promoting quality research and value exchanges and how these benefit innovators.
For more details, contact the HHS press office at (202) 690-6343.
And tell them Drugwonks sent you.
C-Path Expands Partnerships to Speed Development of Critical New Drug Therapies
Dear Friend of C-Path:
Thanks to Arizona supporters, C-Path was created in Tucson four short years ago and we have been very successful in bringing drastic improvements to the methods used to evaluate new drugs and diagnostic tests; changes that are advancing personalized medicine. In addition, Arizona’s Governor, The Honorable Janet Napolitano, along with our state and federal legislators, have been very supportive of our work and our mission.
One of the state’s truly innovative new programs is Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz) which provides highly competitive grants to support meritorious collaborations between scientists and businesses in Arizona. Last year we were fortunate to receive one of the first of these highly competitive awards.
And again, I am extremely pleased to tell you that we have just been awarded a four year SFAz grant for $9 million. With this award, we will be able to expand our work and form additional industry-FDA consortia. These new consortia will improve our understanding of major diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s so that, when effective treatments are discovered, they can be developed in less than three years and with a 95% chance of success; not the current situation, 15 years and a 5% chance of success.
Thank you for your friendship and interest in C-Path.
Best wishes,
Ray Woosley

